There was a moment of silence. “But you have bodyguards, and I'm sure you have plenty of nannies at home, right?"

"Can a nanny replace a mother?"

Another moment of silence followed.

A female coworker chimed in, saying, “I wish I could stay home with my child too, but I can't. I totally understand Ms. Haynes."

Hilaria added, “My son isn't very close to me either. I didn't have much time to care for him when he was young, so his grandmother raised him. Now, he's closer to her than he is to me."

When it came to being present for their children, women seemed to be more aligned with family needs.

It was evident that wealthy individuals faced similar challenges.

The distinction lay in the fact that those without wealth worked primarily to make a living.

While the rich people pursued their passions.

The gap between them was immense.

The former lacked the freedom to choose.

But for the latter, choice was always within reach.

Take Camila, for instance. She didn't need to work but didn't worry about finances, steep tuition fees, or daily expenses.

Others hesitated to resign, fearing they couldn't afford to Live.

Hilaria gulped down two mouthfuls of wine and chimed in, “I support you. You're in a position to stay home and look after your child without needing to work. Honestly, if my husband were as wealthy as yours, I would've quit ages ago."

She laughed at herself, saying, "Maybe then my son would be closer to me."

But there was something she couldn't quite grasp.

She glanced at Camila and inquired, "Why is it that men are only expected to earn money, while women need to both make money and take care of the family?"

Camila couldn't answer it!

Maybe women were just more sentimental.